Some of the jurors in theJohnny Deppv.Amber Hearddefamation case struggled to stay awake during the entire six-week trial, according to the court stenographer.
For her defamation countersuit, Heard was awarded $2 million in damages. She plans to appeal the verdict.
“There were a few jurors who were dozing off,” she said, adding that the sleeping jurors were in both the front and back rows. “And it was tough. There were a lot of video deposition, and they would just sit there and all of a sudden I’d see their head drop.”
Johnny Depp and Judy Bellinger after closing arguments on May 27.STEVE HELBER/POOL/AFP via Getty

Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE’s free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Bellinger also added that the “best” juror who paid the most attention ended up being one of the alternates picked at random and ultimately not involved in the final verdict: “Unfortunately, the one alternate that was on there, she was probably the one that listened the most. I watched her facial expressions, she was very deeply into every word that was being said. I thought she would’ve made a great juror, and she did not get to see it to the end.”
“She was paying close attention,” added Bellinger.
After the verdict, Depp, 58, who was not there in person when it was read aloud in the courtroom, said in a statement that the “jury gave me my life back.” Heard, 36, wrote in her own statement that she was “heartbroken” over the “setback” for women.
“I believe Johnny’s attorneys succeeded in getting the jury to overlook the key issue of Freedom of Speech and ignore evidence that was so conclusive that we won in the U.K.,” she wrote, in part. “I’m sad I lost this case. But I am sadder still that I seem to have lost a right I thought I had as an American — to speak freely and openly.”
EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/POOL/AFP via Getty

Heard’s attorney Elaine Bredehoft said on theTodayshow Thursday morning that she felt the actress was “demonized” during the trial as social media was “absolutely” in favor of Depp, possibly affecting the outcome of the case.
“And it was horrible — it really, really was lopsided,” the attorney continued of the online attention. “It was like the Roman Colosseum, how they viewed this whole case.”
Bredehoft added, “I was against cameras in the courtroom, and I went on record with that and had argued against it because of the sensitive nature of this [case]. But it made it a zoo.”
source: people.com