The Earth is lose species much quicker than normal , or than Modern one are evolving . The rate of red may be the dissolute since the backwash of the asteroid that ended the reign of the dinosaurs , 65 million geezerhood ago . This has led some scientist toclaimwe are in a aggregated quenching ; others have pushed back , and the debate has been pass for at least three decades . Professor Alisa Bokulich of Boston University used the pandemic to convene meetings over Zoom to believe this inquiry , among other obese result in the philosophy of science .

The results have now been accept for publication , and the authors confirm the question does not impart itself to simple answers . Nevertheless , on balance the authors conclude we are not in a mass experimental extinction . That does not mean , however , we are not in danger of attain one presently .

A major obstacle to respond the question is that no universally agreed - on definition of a mass extinction be . Five events are tell apart as meeting the criteria , at the ends of theOrdovician , Permian , TriassicandCretaceousperiods , and during theDevonian .

However , another event – orpossibly two – not long before the end - Permian extinction may have seen the disappearance of a high proportion of the Earth ’s coinage than four of these . Despite the plea of some palaeontologists , this issue is currently not sort as a mass extinction . Another candidate occurredbefore multicellular life come out . The spottiness of the fossil record blockade attempts to estimate the badness of each of these case .

In the absence seizure of agreement on what it take to make an outcome a mass extinction , Bokulich and co - source consider historical definitions and why some events have been give the classification and others so far have not . Then , they consider modern conditions in the same light .

Part of the disagreement is because preservation biologists and fossilist look at extinctions other than . Biologists and environmentalists count the departure of each individual specie , since once gone we shall not see their like again . Ancient extinctions , on the other hand , have the departure of an entire genus as their unit of measurement of measurement . As the only surviving members of the genusHomo , the difference may not be applicable to us , but Bokulich give the exemplar ofPanthera , whose surviving extremity admit lions , Tamil Tigers , jaguars , and two mintage of leopards . All five would need to go out before a fossilist would consider it .

" If we were in a sixth mass extinguishing today , we would expect 100 of genera to be lead extinct , but we scarcely acknowledge of any genera being fall behind in modern times , so the numbers do n’t quite liken , ” Bokulich sound out in astatement .

Rates of quenching are probably accelerating , so it might be argue we will be in a mass defunctness before long if we ca n’t turn things around . The newspaper publisher provide ideas on how to improve comparing between the current office and the “ Big Five ” preceding extinction if this occurs . However , it also questions whether this is the good room to think about the current crisis , given what we are learning about the diversity in mass extinctions ’ drive and the length of time over which they occurred .

The newspaper is due to be write in theBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science . Thepreprint is availablehere .